عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
One of branches of Qur’anic science is to determining Mobhamat. The intended purpose of Mobhamat of Qur’an are places, people, ethics and objects that in Qur’an speaks about them ambiguously and their meaning is not clearly. Moreover, a part of Qur’anic details such as Qur’anic stories and unseen matters like the truth of Angels, Satan, Jinn and heaven also are including in Mobhamat. A number of interpreters for explaining Mobhamat only confine to things that understand from verses of Qur’an but a group of them resort to Hadith and so far that even utilize from Israeeli Hadiths and willingly narrated them, of course one of contexts of Israeeli Hadiths are Mobhamat. Thus this research with comparative-analytic method and with aim of comparative examination of two interpretative books of Al Menar and Al Forqan explains place and role of Hadiths in illustration of Qur’an’s Mobhamat. The findings of this study shows that these interpretations were from first group and severely abstain from Hadiths especially Israeeli Hadiths and suffice to their understanding from Holy Qur’an. Some of their important reasons for abstaining from Hadiths are: the silence of God in mentioning more details in these verses, weakness in interpretative Hadiths, existence of Israeeli in Hadiths and the problem of narrating the meaning in Hadiths.