عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]چکیده [English]
In Islamic jurisprudence with adducing to Qur’an and Hadiths some Times and Places have special honor that committed crime in them is sacrilege. Therefore the punishment of murderers become multiple and in case of paying atonement to avenger of blood, a third part of the atonement would become multiple and would add to payout atonement. The subject of pulsing two reasons (Sabab) for Taqliz and its Hokm in amount of Taqliz is a point that jurist and lawyers did not pay attention truly to it. On the basis of principles such as “principle of overlap reasons”, a group believes on justifiability of multiple Taqliz and on the basis ofBera’at principle a group doesn’t believe on justifiability of multiple Taqliz. With consideration of principles and jurisprudence essentials, in the case of pulsing reasons, being content to a third amount of atonement as Taqliz it is preferable.