A comparative study of the crime of group ejaculation, based on the philosophy of limits

Sanchooli, Zeinab; Kaykha, Mohammad Reza

doi:10.22034/mtmi.2025.417949.1700

A comparative study of the crime of group ejaculation, based on the philosophy of limits

Articles in Press

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

zeinab sanchooli ¹

mohammad reza kaykha ²

¹ Professor and member of the faculty of theology department, Zahedan branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.

² unAssociate Professor Department of Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law, Sistan and Baluchestan University.

10.22034/mtmi.2025.417949.1700

Abstract

Sometimes a person harasses and insults a group with rude words; In this case, there is a wide difference of opinion among the jurists of Islamic schools of thought regarding the way of implementing Hadd. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the scientific foundations of each point of view in order to reveal a sound point of view based on the philosophy of the implementation of limits. This article is done in a descriptive and analytical way, it shows that according to the philosophy of the implementation of limits, which is deterrence from crimes, and also by referring to the rule of interference of causes and causes and the rule of interference of punishment in the same number of crimes and the implementation of severe punishment in the case of crimes. Different - which is in accordance with articles 256, 257 and 258 of the Islamic Penal Code and in accordance with the famous opinion of the Imamiyyah jurists and part of the opinions of the Sunni jurists -, the promise in detail between blasphemy with one word or blasphemy with multiple words and also between the quality of the demand of the falsified , be more logical.

Keywords

Qadzf Jamaat

Hadd Qadzf

philosophy of limits

punishment

Imamiya jurists

Sunni jurists