نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The obligation of prayer, as the pillar of religion and the reason for the acceptance of other religious acts of Muslims, is the most important obligation of the Islam. In comparative jurisprudence, "ṣalāh" is one of the rites that the analytical and comparative examination of its nature, elements and conditions will reveal the points of commonality and difference in the viewpoints and methods of confronting Islamic schools of jurisprudence. According to the jurisprudence of the major schools of thought, time, purification, veiling of the private parts, facing the Qibla, etc, are conditions that the validity of daily prayers depends on their fulfillment. The Imamiyyah jurisprudence and four schools of thought, each using their own sources and documents, have deduced and extracted jurisprudential rulings that the three Imamiyyah, Hanafiyyah and Hanbaliyyah Denominations, despite differences, have divided the obligations of prayer into two categories: rokn and non-rokn; But Shafi'i and Maliki believe that there are no obligations for prayer other than the pillars. The book "al-khalal fī al-ṣalāh" by Mohaghegh Karaki is a short jurisprudential and argumentative treatise on the problem of prayer and complaints, which he wrote in two general categories: mistake and doubt. After its introduction, this article has investigated this issue as a basis for creating unity between Islamic Denominations, by stating the cases of consensus of Shia and Sunni jurists on the issue of al-khalal fī al-ṣalāh and its feasibility has been assessed.
کلیدواژهها English
